The triplebyte interviews were pretty tightly scripted to try and remove interviewer bias. If you did two interviews with TB, you would have found them pretty similar.
We also did tell candidates what to expect and how to prepare. Most candidates didn’t read our preparation notes. The people who did did better in the interview.
And it turned out “fine” anyway because HR didn’t read the job posting and now the hiring manager is somehow interviewing an SAP developer for a Dynamics position.
Even though interviews between companies are wildly different, there is a correlation between doing more and getting good at them.
There’s a lot of performance and interview skills involved in the talking part of an interview. It’s not just the hacker code part that benefits from training
They told you (or me at least) almost exactly everything that would be in the interview ahead of time, to the point that I just recalled a lot from my notes I made the night before the call. Source: I completed the TB process, but it was 8ish years ago.
I think practice interviews can still be helpful. Some of the reasons I’ve seen candidates blow an interview boil down to nerves. I think practice interviews help in these situations as things that are more familiar tend to be less nerve wracking.
Maybe instead of a 'practice' interview people can just be told what to expect so they know how to prepare.
Offering practice interviews just makes it sound like the interview is a performance.