But they do have judicial oversight. It's a really bizarre response in the context of this thread.

They do now. Before Chevron was reversed, the stuff that appeared to be judicial oversight was being done by the agencies themselves, not by the judiciary.

That's not true at all.

That is literally what Chevron doctrine is.

In part, yes. But it's certainly not the whole of the issue and you are purposefully misrepresenting the nature of litigation here.