I have opened the article in question. I have NOT worked through the technical problem, the complications and interpretation surrounding Ballmer, nor have I digested the contention being presented. I am capable of these things but I am on the clock and I do not value performing the work required for this particular article.
With that said, I wanted to share the following. Perhaps it will spur discussion.
Our leadership -- whether in our professional circumstances, in our sovereign and communal circumstances, or in our choice to lead ourselves; perhaps it is in these leaders that a view, or a decision, or a proclamation -- perhaps it is in these impulses that the world is changed.
Can you assign truth to an impulse? Is it a communication for consideration? Is it a demand for compliance?
I assert that you can do so. The words were spoken. Thus, the impulse was true.
With that said, I wanted to share the following. Perhaps it will spur discussion.
Our leadership -- whether in our professional circumstances, in our sovereign and communal circumstances, or in our choice to lead ourselves; perhaps it is in these leaders that a view, or a decision, or a proclamation -- perhaps it is in these impulses that the world is changed.
Can you assign truth to an impulse? Is it a communication for consideration? Is it a demand for compliance?
I assert that you can do so. The words were spoken. Thus, the impulse was true.
If you desire to do so, please consider.