Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That sounds like an ad-hominem attack to avoid the question, tbh.


At the risk of sounding snarky: It wasn’t. It does however, answer the question. “We” do not need to change our allocation strategy whatsoever because “we” didn’t allocate any resources towards this and “we” aren’t the arbiter of what others can or cannot do with their resources.


"We" as in "us humans".


You have my permission. This is snark.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: