Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just read through the motions and pleadings and you get the picture of what is going on https://infowarslawsuit.com/heslin-versus-jones/

They brought a case. They asked for discovery. The Jones team explicitly did not respond to discovery. The court sanctioned for a while, giving Jones more time. Eventually the case was brought to default. Because this is a civil case, that is very reasonable given the extraordinary lengths Jones's team went to avoid actually complying with court orders. Then the damages hearing was held, where evidence was presented to show that defamation happened. The jury agreed. The only real issue with this is that people don't like to read, and they would rather listen to Alex Jones's version of the story. This was a defamation case, which everyone has a right to, and Jones repeatedly spat in the face of the process (including destroying evidence). It is hard to see how this case was handled poorly, and bad vibes alone aren't enough to say it was mishandled. This was a long process that Jones could have handled, but he gambled with his legal strategy and lost.



He did present his view in the damages portion. And the court ruled that he did not comply with discovery. Then later in the damages portion of the trial, it was proven he lied. Like, on live camera.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: