Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> There are already H5N1 vaccines for both chickens and humans; pharma companies are working hard on cows.

We need another term besides "vaccine" for the class of inoculations which don't prevent disease spread but rather lessen the (statistical) occurrence of severe illness. A lot of the focus on "vaccines" for chickens, cows, pigs etc. is on preventing severe illness: preventing serious illness still allows product to be delivered to market (hopefully post illness) whereas preventing disease spread requires a commitment to culling breakthroughs which interferes with profit!

My general understanding that preventing serious illness, rather than transmission, is the objective with current influenza vaccines for humans as well.

(As long as they're not noticeably sick, I'll keep on hugging my chickens as a source of generalized immunity to both coronaviruses and influenza.)



Even among vaccines that are effective enough to halt a pathogen on a population level, it doesn't mean it guarantees immunity on an individual level. Some people vaccinated for smallpox or polio or measles caught them anyway back when they were endemic, but usually with milder disease due to the prior vaccination.


From Wikipedia:

> Vaccines can be prophylactic (to prevent or alleviate the effects of a future infection by a natural or "wild" pathogen), or therapeutic (to fight a disease that has already occurred, such as cancer).


Pre-medication?

Wait, here's a better one: speculative therapy

Also make it invite only




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: