And, as the article insists on, for robots to be acceptable, it's more like they need to get to a point where they fail 1 time in 156 (or even less, depending on how critical the failure is), rather than succeed 1 time in 156...
And, as the article insists on, for robots to be acceptable, it's more like they need to get to a point where they fail 1 time in 156 (or even less, depending on how critical the failure is), rather than succeed 1 time in 156...