> So on the one hand the New York Post is "a rag" as nicbou said, but on the other hand its reporters' judgments are reliable.
Another way to look at it is that the story stank so much, even NYPost reporters (who are probably used to the gutter journalism) didn't want their name near it.
Another way to look at it is that the story stank so much, even NYPost reporters (who are probably used to the gutter journalism) didn't want their name near it.