> Self-driving vehicles are the perfect example of how something that seems so close can be so far away.
Remember that this was before transformers, LLMs, and more recently VLM/VLAMs, though.
I'm not sure to what extent these are already integrated in self-driving hardware, but I would not be surprised if we see a big improvement in self-driving due to related technologies soon, especially with the smaller models becoming far more (efficient and) potent.
We have already seen the big improvement in Tesla FSD. Have you test driven it recently? The most impressive part for me was it driving us all the way into the parking lot and parking us in a spot at the destination.
That's a false equivalence. Autonomous vehicles need to be significantly safer than human drivers to be allowed on the streets. If a human driver kills or injures somebody or damages property, they are responsible and will face consequences. An autonomous car won't.
The typical tech person will reply to this with some variant of "that shouldn't matter". Well, it does.
You are responding to this thread as if we were arguing for these cars "being allowed on the streets". That is not the discussion here. Instead, we are talking about AI capacity.
Saying that a Tesla can drive autonomously from LA to NYC, except it can't in reality because other cars are on the road and it might kill someone, is an odd way to frame it.
It's like saying Windows 95 doesn't have any security flaws, as long as you don't connect it to the internet.
You mean your "self-driving" Tesla where you're still sitting in the driver's seat with your hands on the wheel (they are on the wheel, unless you want to admit to a crime)?
Even asking the question would seem to indicate that respondents here, do in fact believe that the technology is good enough to drive people around day after day without my hands on the wheel. (It is.)
I don't know what the questions about texting are relevant to here.
Apologies, I was unclear. I mean that the law and what people do are two seperate affairs. When people act like law dictates reality I'm always perplexed.
Here, if you say your Tesla drives you to work hands-free, I've no problem accepting that as a part of the world.
Albeit in limited areas and, as far as we can tell, with pretty high unit costs.
But I think the smart money is that Waymo will get appreciably better in the 5-10 year timeline. Perhaps massively, crazily better, but at least steadily, noticeably better.
For now Waymo is only used in a few grid cities in southern US where the weather is extremely nice. It's a prime example of the 80/20 problem and a prime example of what the comment your replying to mentions.
They're deploying Waymo in Atlanta now and they're already driving around sans-humans.
Atlanta is not a grid. Atlanta has crazy and dangerous road design. Random roads built in random places. Potholes, lots of hills, sharp angles, lack of shoulders, no margin or protection from 45mph oncoming traffic (90mph delta with ZERO margin or division), weird infrastructure, five and six and even seven way intersections, pedestrians, jaywalkers, motorcycle gangs that ride in the wrong lanes. You name it, Atlanta's got it.
Atlanta has lots of weather. Tremendous amounts of subtropical rain in the summer, fog, and other low visibility and dangerous conditions. Intermittent summer rain that pours so hard that it's a literal rain curtain white out. Seasonal tornadoes.
Self-driving is here now. It'll be everywhere by the end of the decade. I can't wait to buy my own Waymo-equipped vehicle.
That time when people had blocky cell phones. Then they were in everybody's pocket.
That's self-driving now.
It's here, just uneven. You can ride in one today. Soon, it'll be taking over for trucking, delivering everything you can think of on-demand, and revolutionizing how we think about transit and travel.
Instacart and Uber Eats and Amazon same-day are blocky cell phones. Soon we'll have instant logistics. A ten times faster Amazon. A world where almost everything can be delivered instantly and cheaply.
Trains and subways and metros are rigid and inflexible transit corridors. Soon we'll have last-mile transit pods for everyone that connect everything and everywhere and make suburbs highly desirable and sought after again.
Self-driving will be like the internet or smartphones all over again. And we're right at the precipice.
The financial gradients of all of this ensure that it'll happen and that it'll happen fast and all at once once we get past the inflection point.
But back to your point: you wouldn't call those blocky cell phone users non-cellphone users. The tech just wasn't evenly distributed. It got there in short time, because the tech was world-changing. So too shall it be with self-driving. The economic advantages are inevitable.
Okay but it's not even, like, 1% applicable. How many miles out of all miles driven are on Waymo? Honestly, I'm probably being far too generous with saying 1%.
When people say "self driving is here!", they mean most cars on the road are autonomous. The reality is that's 20 years out. The technocrats won't tell you that, but just think about it. Average age of a car on US roads is 13 years right now.
April 29, 2014 - "Milken 2014: Driverless cars due in five years"[0]
Nov 24, 2015 - "Ford is 5 years away from self-driving cars"[1]
Oct 20, 2016 - "A Driverless Tesla Will Travel From L.A. to NYC by 2017"[2]
Now general consensus is level 5 autonomous self-driving is decades away, at least.
[0] https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2014/04/29/milken-...
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/ford-is-5-years-away-from-se...
[2] https://www.nbcnews.com/business/autos/driverless-tesla-will...