Just chiming in to say that this piece's summary of my argument about "hallucinations" is incorrect; it is not my claim that "reading the code" solves hallucinations.
(You have to read the code anyways, but by the time you're reading it, there shouldn't be hallucinations, in a modern workflow.)
(You have to read the code anyways, but by the time you're reading it, there shouldn't be hallucinations, in a modern workflow.)