Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Or a CD, or maybe just a bank account. I think of stablecoin issuers as banks because why not: they keep your cash, pay you some yield and promise to give it back to you when you ask them. Walks like a bank, quacks like a bank…


> keep your cash, pay you some yield

The GENUIS act and I think MICA both disallow that part, exactly for this reason... traditional banks were seeing the writings on the wall and lobbied for such yield distributions to remain their own privilege only. For now.

But you can pretty easily find similar/better yield using DeFi and stake/bond some of your crypto assets in various strategies.

The difference is that there are virtually no minimum and usually no KYC... but there are also not many guardrails/gatekeeping, which leave the place to many scams/traps. It's best to stick to the largest platforms/communities and not fall for insane APY claims.


Does holding stablecoins require any sort of KYC? Or do I just need to maintain the security of a private key?

If the latter, I think that explains why stablecoins are popular in countries with weak institutions.

In a country with strong laws, and strong rule-of-law, "Code is Law" is a solution in search of a problem. But in a country with weak laws, it can be a lifesaver.


Coins discourage if not undermine rule of law and weaken strong institutions. It’s the cat chasing it’s tail.


What's the evidence for this?


Their usage.


I'd consider this more of an export of US law than 'Code is Law' TBH.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: