>NAT (and no NAT is not a fucking security feature and is orthogonal to fucking ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		taskforcegemini 5 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: I tried living on IPv6 for a day >NAT (and no NAT is not a fucking security feature and is orthogonal to fucking firewalls..) is this about the meaning of the term "NAT"? because of course it is a security feature if something is offline by default

Hizonner 5 months ago [–]

A box that enforces that doesn't have to do NAT. In fact it's simpler and less error-prone if it doesn't.

I will be over there soon.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact