https://searx.com/ (if I got the URL correctly) requires JavaScript. Unlike Google, https://startpage.com/es/q=<search string> (secured HTTP mandatory) doesn't accept Umlauts in strings. Translations are unavailable, such as http://google.com/search?q=on+a+particular+base+translate+Ge... did. (Pure translation services require JS for results to be rendered, altogether.) Third, StartPage's result pages are ten times bigger than Google's were. Viktor Lofgren's https://old-search.marginalia.nu/search?query=<string> searches in a traditional manner. An interesting concept. It's output is much different to what I was used from answers to natural language queries, however. The interface of Will's https://4get.ca/ is as slim as Google's, but replies to (mandatory) Captchas require JavaScript. In ten days since Google blocked searches, I haven't found an appropriate alternative. Torsten

Is this about the search engine? Why not use a different one? Google's search isn't any better than the others, and is worse than a few of them.

Tried marginalia... New web interface does some kind of proof of work as well, so had to switch to old-search. 6 hours later, marginalia was down/unavailable. Probably picked a bad moment in time, but no, that wasnt similar nor equal.

try

SearX; gets its results from a number of search engines, can be customised to work only with google.

StartPage; pulls results from google search anonymously.