Harsh legal limits seems obvious to me. If society benefits at all from sports betting, all that benefit happens in the first few hundred bucks of spending. Meanwhile all the biggest harms to society are happening when people spend a lot.
The fact that these limits don't exist seems like evidence that the lawmakers didn't care about the effects on society.
> The fact that these limits don't exist seems like evidence that the lawmakers didn't care about the effects on society.
The lawmakers care primarily about the wants of their corporate donors, which is why this legalized gambling situation arose, and also why you have many geriatric congress people on both sides of the aisle suddenly very interested in legitimizing crypto with soft "regulation".
The fact that these limits don't exist seems like evidence that the lawmakers didn't care about the effects on society.