As with alcohol (and I say it as someone with alcoholics in the family), there are the vast majority of users who are doing nothing wrong; sellers who are generally not doing anything wrong (ok, banning sharps is wrong, but that is not core to the service and could be regulated at the cost of higher fees for everyone). And then there are few alcoholics/whales who ruin their lives.
It is bizarre to me personally that what we want to regulate/stigmatize are sellers and even recreational users (50+% of men who have an account or whatever), and not the over users. Instead, we try to protect over users from themselves, and society from them, by making life worse for everyone else doing the pass time. That to me seems deeply immoral. By cracking down on abuse or consequences of abuse we could protect the society, and abusers themselves deserve everything they get - although if we treat them like children "you are demonstrably not responsible so like a 13 year old you don't get to drink/manage your own money anymore" that would also be accomplished.
It is bizarre to me personally that what we want to regulate/stigmatize are sellers and even recreational users (50+% of men who have an account or whatever), and not the over users. Instead, we try to protect over users from themselves, and society from them, by making life worse for everyone else doing the pass time. That to me seems deeply immoral. By cracking down on abuse or consequences of abuse we could protect the society, and abusers themselves deserve everything they get - although if we treat them like children "you are demonstrably not responsible so like a 13 year old you don't get to drink/manage your own money anymore" that would also be accomplished.