In this situation, humans are more accurate, for now, so it's good information t... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		motoxpro 4 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Kagi News In this situation, humans are more accurate, for now, so it's good information to have. Same as I would like to know if humans self assessed in a study about how well they drive vs the empirical evidence. Humans just aren't that good at that task so it would be good to know coming in. Just call it Kagi Vibes instead of Kagi News as news has a higher bar (at least for me)

stavros 4 months ago [–]

I'm not sure I agree that humans are more accurate at summarizing, but I don't have data, so I'll take your word for it.

motoxpro 4 months ago | [–]

I'd point to Wikipedia. You can say the content is "wrong". But the links go to the right place.

stavros 4 months ago | | [–]

In my experience with Claude research, the links ~always go to the right place.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact