Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The layman's understanding of war is less guided by international law and more around ideas like "tit for tat". Eg if Hamas kills 1000 Israeli civilians, Israel is entitled to kill 1000 Palestinian civilians, but should stop after that.

Is it the better response under international law? Not necessarily, but it would be better PR.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: