Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"A thing is X if you don't use the definition of X" isn't incredibly helpful information.


It might as well be a warzone ....

> https://www.google.com/search?q=california+declares+war+on+t...

> California has not declared war on Texas, but the states are engaged in a "redistricting war," a political struggle over drawing new congressional maps. This "war" is a symbolic conflict between the states' differing political parties and aims to gain an advantage in the U.S. House of Representatives, with California attempting to counterbalance Texas's Republican-drawn map.

If numerous publications are referring to your country having a war, then it might as well be ok for a lay-person to use the word.


Yeah, everyone in the 80s remembers what a hell hole america was thanks to what Pepsi and coke were engaged in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cola_wars


That’s just figurative speech about redistricting. I think you’re mistaking Americans tendency to use militaristic metaphors in our discourse.


I'm in the middle of nuking some legacy code rn, literal war up in here


You're overlooking that in this case "the definition of X" is outdated. One example for this would be asymmetrical warfare.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: