Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's not possible to provide a path for advanced users that a stupid person can't be coerced to use.

Moreover, it's not possible to provide a path for advanced users that a stupid person won't use by accident, either.

These are what drive many instances of completely missing paths for advanced users. It's not possible to stop coercion or accidents. It is literally impossible. Any company that doesn't want to take the risk can only leave advanced users completely out of the picture. There's nothing else they can do.

Google will fail to prevent misuse of this feature, and advanced users will eventually be left in the dust completely as Google learns there's no way to safely provide for them. This is inevitable.



Android could have, for example, a 24 hour "cooling off" period for sideloading approval. Much like some bootloader unlocking - make it subject to a delay.

That immediately takes the pressure off people who are being told that their bank details are at immediate risk.


> Android could have, for example, a 24 hour "cooling off" period for sideloading approval.

And, to prevent the scammer from simply calling back once the 24 hours are gone, make it show a couple of warnings (at random times so they can't be predicted by the scammer) explaining the issue, with rejecting these warnings making the cooling off timer reset (so a new attempt to enable would need another full 24 hours).


The people gullible enough to fall for a scam like that are also gullible enough to follow more instructions 24 hours later. I think if you could force a call to the phone and have an agent or even AI that talks to user and makes sure no scam is involved then gives an unlock code based on deviceID or something. But that would cost money and scammers would work around it anyway.


>It's not possible to provide a path for advanced users that a stupid person can't be coerced to use.

I actually think you might be wrong about this? Imagine if Google forced you to solve a logic puzzle before sideloading. The puzzle could be very visual in nature, so even if a scammer asked the victim to describe the puzzle over the phone, this usually wouldn't allow the scammer to solve it on the victim's behalf. The puzzle could be presented in a special OS mode to prevent screenshots, with phone camera disabled so the puzzle can't be photographed in a mirror, and phone call functionality disabled so a scammer can't talk you through it as easily. Scammers would tell the victim to go find a friend, have the friend photograph the puzzle, and send the photo to the scammer. At which point the friend hopefully says "wait, wtf is going on here?" (Especially if the puzzle has big text at the top like "IF SOMEONE ASKS YOU TO PHOTOGRAPH THIS, THEY ARE LIKELY VICTIM OF AN ONGOING SCAM, YOU SHOULD REFUSE", and consists of multiple stages which need to be solved sequentially.)

In addition to logic puzzles, Google could also make you pass a scam awareness quiz =) You could interleave the quiz questions with logic puzzle stages, to help the friend who's photographing the puzzle figure out what's going on.

I guess this could fail for users who have two devices, e.g. a laptop plus a phone, but presumably those users tend to have a little more technical sophistication. Maybe display a QR code in the middle of the puzzle which opens up scam awareness materials if photographed?

Or, instead of a "scam awareness quiz" you could could give the user an "ongoing scam check", e.g.: "Did a stranger recently call you on the phone and tell you to navigate to this functionality?" If the user answers yes, disable sideloading for the next 48 hours and show them scam education materials.


It would also fail for users who are differently abled. That sounds like an absolute nightmare for accessibility. Good news for preventing scams, but bad news for anyone without full mental and physical faculties.


I'm not sure why you couldn't make the flow I describe just as accessible as anything else in Android? But I'll grant your premise and respond anyways.

If the user lacks full mental faculties, they are part of the userbase we need to protect from scams. Most likely, a user without full mental faculties who is trying to sideload will be a scam victim.

If the user lacks the necessary physical faculties to "solve a puzzle on their phone", they probably get help from friends regularly; a friend should be able to help with sideloading. Enabling sideloading should be a one-time operation right?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: