> including more than 30,000 women and children according to Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry – figures the UN considers reliable.
Lol, yeah. Thank god we have such paragons of honest reporting as Iran-Qatar coalition of losers and their band of mercs and terrorists. Where would we get reliable info if not for them.
What next? Maria Zakharova nominated for Pulitzer?
My data is based on the internationally recognized fact that Hamas is terrorist organization by USA, Commonwealth, EU, Japan and others. Which means they (Hamas) are liars.
Journalist's data is based on the empty words of the said terrorist org.
I don't know about you, but I feel very confident in my opinion based of this data.
PS: also you don't know what ad hominem means and confuse it with regular criticism. I've never attacked journalist's personal life or inividual traits or even his unrelated articles.
Whatever tickles your fancy. You can take side of almost 40 civilized countries, topping the charts of human freedom, education, quality of life, intellectual pursuits, research etc. or the side of Axis of Losers, like Ruzzia, Iran, Best Korea, Venezuela etc. Your choice.
Around a hundred of the countries didn't designate Hamas as terrorists, but neither they support them, they are simply neutral and ignoring the issue.
And btw, your count is wrong. There are only 205 countries at all, plus or minus a handful maybe. Almost 40 of them designated Hamas as terrorists, so that leaves less than 200, not more.
The UN is not an unbiased institution. It’s a representation of the viewpoints of countries, and it’s quite obvious that many member countries are biased to one side on the matter.
Countries get an equal vote regardless if they are corrupt dictatorships with abysmal human rights at home.
Lol, yeah. Thank god we have such paragons of honest reporting as Iran-Qatar coalition of losers and their band of mercs and terrorists. Where would we get reliable info if not for them.
What next? Maria Zakharova nominated for Pulitzer?