Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> To some extent that was Stack Overflow

Yup, that was always very much the plan, from the earliest days. Shame it soured a bit, but since the content is all freely reusable, maybe something can be built atop the ashes?



There is https://grokipedia.com which encourages you to suggest an article and you may submit improvements to an existing article.


This is _not_ at all the same thing. Grok just ripped off Wikipedia as its base and then applied a biased spin to it. Check out the entry on Grok owner Elon Musk; it praises his accomplishments and completely omits or downplays most of his better-known controversies.


And everything is “fact checked” by the Grok LLM. Which… Yeah…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)#Controversies


The Grok information source is more reliable than Wikipedia.

Objectively and incrementally improving. The leadership behind Grok is human rated safe rocket science quality.

Whereas Wikipedia is a fugly dumpsterdive.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: