> I would imagine your idea of "attacking" the second amendment is just common sense laws.
I would imagine your idea of "Common Sense laws" is actually just petty attacks on law-abiding citizens that do nothing to stop crime, so I guess we're even.
> it just illustrates the right never actually cared about standing up to oppressive governments,
My comment was not trying to argue that the Right did or does care. My comment was saying "This is the reason there are comparatively so few gun owners on the (American) Left". Because the American Left (speaking broadly) discouraged it for almost a century.
> I would imagine your idea of "Common Sense laws" is actually just petty attacks on law-abiding citizens that do nothing to stop crime, so I guess we're even
You imagine wrong, but you use that word "attack" again.
> My comment was not trying to argue that the Right did or does care
You make that sound irrelevant, like the right is a third party in this, and not the dominant party killing citizens in the street. I don't care what lazy gotcha you were trying to angle for, your comment was disgusting.
I would imagine your idea of "Common Sense laws" is actually just petty attacks on law-abiding citizens that do nothing to stop crime, so I guess we're even.
> it just illustrates the right never actually cared about standing up to oppressive governments,
My comment was not trying to argue that the Right did or does care. My comment was saying "This is the reason there are comparatively so few gun owners on the (American) Left". Because the American Left (speaking broadly) discouraged it for almost a century.