Actually, we don't stop kids from buying cigarettes, we punish stores that sell cigarettes to kids and are caught! That's my entire point! You just made my argument for me!
And the store does not use facial recognition and/or checking id to know if the potential buyer is a kid ?
The only (huge) difference for me is the scale of the verification and how data are stored.
> And the store does not use facial recognition and/or checking id to know if the potential buyer is a kid?
They can just not serve cigarettes. In addition I think it's also insane to compare cigarettes, which are purely negative, to free internet usage which is massively net positive.
Despite the headline, does this law actually punish the children if they are caught with social media accounts? Or is the burden on the social media providers?
