I guess what I mean is that as a purported figure of Internet freedom and federal overreach, weev is not a great poster boy. Usually, when you're in the position of picking battles to fight, as Kerr is, you want everything in your favor, and hell, why not a defendant that you have no problem being associated with. Kerr's insistence on turning back a flawed law apparently outweighs whatever distaste he might have for weev on a personal or political level. So, good on Mr. Kerr.