Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think it's more that long, detailed, well-supported points tend to get more karma than simple one-liners. IIRC, PG posted once that there was a big correlation between comment length and score.

I've noticed much less of a correlation between popularity and score than I would've expected - certainly much less than at Reddit, where you can write a detailed page-long comment that completely demolishes the parent's argument, and then have it sit at -1 because voters on Reddit reflexively downvote articles that don't fit their preconceptions. Here, that same comment is often at +10 or more.



> IIRC, PG posted once that there was a big correlation between comment length and score.

Yes, he wrote that. I wrote a small script to test that proposition. It does not hold up. If there is a correlation, it is only very weak.

You can have the source, if you wish. The script's written in Python.


I'm interested eru - could I see the script?


I have now sanitized the program. Anyone else wants to play with it?

PG, is it OK to download such massive amounts of items?


I'd definitely agree that it's far worse at Reddit. And I hear you on comment length, but I took care not to mention length because it's possible for well-written, long comments to make a widely accepted point.


On Reddit, it's the short, witty comments that get the most votes. Unfortunately.

Well thought out, detailed, long comments often end up with just a few points, or worse, in the negative, because of "too long, didn't read".


If post A and post B are equally convincing and interesting, but B is twice as long, then A is clearly superior.


They are rarely equally convincing and interesting, though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: