Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not sure that's the problem though. yapache and yphp solve a very important need and probably saved Yahoo!'s ass on multiple occasions with engineers making lazy or common mistakes.

There might have been a better way to implement it but with a company the size of Yahoo! I think they'd have the resources to maintain/patch such critical flaws. So the idea of a home-grown (really it's more of a patched version of apache / php than anything else) isn't entirely crazy.

Just looks like this one slipped through the cracks.



Nobody was really working on yapache when I worked there around 2 years ago.


The idea of still using Apache / PHP nowadays is pretty crazy if you ask me.


I could say the same about most of the supposed superior replacements.

Everything is dangerous in the hands of idiots. The technology is almost entirely irrelevant to the discussion.


Half the world must be crazy. What is better and why?


Nginx, Node.js … and Twitter Bootstrap, obviously. (scnr)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: