Looks well and cool, but the enterprise "pricing" seems a little... optimistic.
> $5000/month
> An annual meeting with core team
I understand that these are technically "donations" but the incentives offered are very much just a lightweight support agreement for 2-10x the price.
I have no reason to believe that a python based UI solution that finally captures some market share could be a big success, and are that point the pseudo donation model would go out the window. Best of luck to these guys, would be cool to not be forced to use TKinter in school assignments.
That is absolutely insane. What exactly do you get for $60,000 a year?
I could hire a contractor to build out all the UI in whatever framework I want. Plus I avoid paying someone to build it + pay for the framework.
BTW, I've used QT4 in the past with python and it was an absolutely dream to work with. In 2 months part time work, I was able to produce a very high quality app that worked on windows, linux, macos. Highly recommend instead of TK.
Have you used wxPython at all by chance? Curious how it compares in developer experience compared to PyQt/PySide. I like that it uses native widgets, but if Qt is that much easier to deal with I may just go that direction.
I actually looked into wxPython, admittedly only for a day or two to get the general idea behind it. It seemed complicated and not very mature at the time from my experience under linux (circa 2019 I want to say?)
But after spending the same amount of time with QT it definitely won out.
> $5000/month
> An annual meeting with core team
I understand that these are technically "donations" but the incentives offered are very much just a lightweight support agreement for 2-10x the price.
I have no reason to believe that a python based UI solution that finally captures some market share could be a big success, and are that point the pseudo donation model would go out the window. Best of luck to these guys, would be cool to not be forced to use TKinter in school assignments.